Privatising primary care.

نویسندگان

  • Allyson Pollock
  • David Price
چکیده

The judicial review of the decision to award general practice services in Derby to an American corporation UnitedHealth Europe (UHE) goes to the heart of the corporate takeover of the NHS. Lawyers representing the Secretary of State told the judge that the contract to UHE was no different from replacing a retiring GP, a decision made hundreds of times a year. 1 But this careful choreography has failed to dispel growing anxieties about the aggressive commercial takeover of general practice and other NHS clinical services. There has been little discussion about the risks and costs of opening general practice to the market. When challenged, government replies that general practice has always been run as a business because GPs are independent contractors to the NHS. But there are crucial differences in the policy with serious implications for staff and patients. First, the 60-year–old arrangements where GPs contract directly with the Secretary of State to provide care has been dissolved. In its place are four new contracting options, each of which is between the government or local health commissioners and healthcare companies. GPs themselves will be under contract to companies or trusts, not the state. The alternative provider medical services (APMS) contract, the fourth route that marks off this reform from earlier revisions, allows commercial companies to hold the provider contract. 2 Second, each of the four new contracting routes and associated payment systems combine to end the open-ended commitment to provide care. Instead, primary care services are being broken up into saleable commodities under a process known in the world of privatisation as 'unbundling'. Unbundling limits the general medical service (GMS) contract to a core service that can be topped up with locally negotiated additional elements provided by large corporations. These new entry points and market opportunities for commercial providers are already being exploited for out-of-hours services and immunisation. In addition, under the privately financed investment programme known as LIFT (Local Improvement Finance Trust), primary care trusts (PCTs) can invite corporations to provide both primary care and clinical care currently provided in hospitals. For example, in Barking and Dagenham, Care UK, a company that doubled its profits last year running care homes and private hospitals, has an APMS contract linked to a LIFT scheme to provide new facilities for elective surgery which will be transferred from local NHS hospitals. Ministers want to shift at least 10% of the hospital budget to …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Does Privatising Public Service Provision Reduce Accountability?

This paper studies how privatising service provision (shifting control rights and contractual obligations to providers) a ects accountability. There are two main e ects. (1) Privatisation demotivates governments from investigating and responding to public demands, since providers then hold up service adaptations. (2) Privatisation demotivates the public from mobilising to pressure for service a...

متن کامل

Privatisation of health services and the reproductive health of rural Chinese women.

China's rural health care system has undergone major changes since the early 1980s, when the country began privatising rural health services. Following fiscal devolution, the rural primary health service was transformed into a fee-for-service system, dependent on the availability of local resources. This article reports some of the results of a study undertaken in 1994-96 to examine the impact ...

متن کامل

The Newcomer Health Clinic in Nova Scotia: A Beacon Clinic to Support the Health Needs of the Refugee Population

Refugees tend to have greater vulnerability compared to the general population reporting greater need for physical, emotional, or dental problems compared to the general population. Despite the importance of creating strong primary care supports for these patients, it has been demonstrated that there is a significant gap in accessing primary care providers who are willi...

متن کامل

Privatisation and outsourcing in wartime: the humanitarian challenges.

The tendency today to privatise many activities hitherto considered the exclusive preserve of the state has given rise to sharp debate. The specific nature of humanitarian emergencies elucidates in particularly stark contrast some of the main challenges connected to the privatisation and outsourcing of essential public services, such as the provision of drinking water and health care. Privatisi...

متن کامل

Clinical Governance in Primary Care Principles, Prerequisites and Barriers: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Primary care organizations are the entities through which clinical governance is developed at local level. To implement clinical governance in primary care, awareness about principles, prerequisites and barriers of this quality improvement paradigm is necessary. The aim of this study is to pool evidence about implementing clinical governance in primary care organizations. Data so...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

دوره 56 529  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006